|
|
|
|
COMMENT
February 11th 2009
By Andrew Greig
In the news
at the moment are the world economy and
As to the
economy, we all know how much the military is costing us. Its around a 1000
billion dollars a year just for the military investment and that leaves out
all the costs of disruption and damage. Manufacturing weapons and employing
soldiers can be a big stimulus to the economy at first that is. There are
probably a few politicians who would be quite happy to see some new wars to
boost employment in their electorate.
Leaving
aside the moral and humanitarian issues, moving to non-lethal warfare will
generate a range of new industries and technologies. Conventional lethal
weapons will be replaced by succeeding generations of non-lethal devices,
providing ongoing employment.
Looking
back on these events, the Israeli attack has been a vivid, if very unhappy,
demonstration of the unsuitability of conventional lethal weapons in this
conflict. The destruction of property and the killing of civilians by
high explosive shells did not stop the rocket attacks. They caused huge
unnecessary grief and destruction. Their effect will significantly delay any
sensible resolution of the issues between
Would there
have been a different outcome if, hypothetically,
If Hamas
had employed (deliberately designed!) non-lethal devices of some sort say,
noisy but harmless fireworks they could have proved a point, but not goaded
In turn, if
16th
Century
By William
Shakespeare
..tame the savage spirit of wild war, that, like a lion fostered up at
hand, it may lie gently at the foot of peace..
King
John, Act V, Scene 2